More About Dianetics

I could not ever not intend to receive anything that comes to mind for you- if it was or else, I would not be sitting below with you, doing this. I not only might never have a problem, or not desire to listen to something that comes to mind for you, however I'm completely eager to recognize every concept, every thought, every image or sensation that emerges or materializes for you- don't ever before assume otherwise, and if for some reason you do, please simply allow me know! Often, you may have an idea, and image, concept or case turn up that does not appear to address the inquiry, or connect to it, however nonetheless, constantly do tell me regarding it, and as we proceed, the significance will emerge for you.


This is inherent in the basis of processing, and the subject of this discussion: the basic functions of the therapist and the client: The standard duty of the counselor is, in contrast to "basic training", not to control, which indicates to implement and/or hinder, but to rather function from the basis of EMPOWERING THE CUSTOMER.

In subjective processing, whatever was claimed in one's training materials, the processor is not there "to manage" the client. On the contrary, the processor exists to provide the client the flexibility and undistracted focus to process and share what shows up, and what materializes is what arises when the client deals with the material that connects to their very own goals for the processing, and for their life.

Our Dianetics Diaries

John Mcmasters expressed this basic truth wonderfully well in one of his talks on Power processing, where he describes exactly how he was asked what this "special flair" was that he had for giving such great sessions; he needed to believe regarding that for a minute, and identified that it was what he wasn't doing, as well as what he was doing: he had not been reviewing, judging, computer, or in truth, producing any thoughts, let alone spoken expressions, after giving the command and while awaiting the PC to finish their solution to their contentment; he was, simply and only, being present with the PC, and entirely interested.




The duty of the therapist, showed; that was his "unique propensity". I have had my very own experience which instructed me this well, really beforehand in the game. In 1982, having actually recently finished my training and teaching fellowship on New Period Dianetics, I was running this on a COMPUTER, and there was wikipedia reference a factor in the session where (being a bit damp behind the ears not yet having lots of hours under my belt as an expert auditor) the computer seemed to be "taking also lengthy" to express anything vocally after I provided him a command.


This secret became one of the most beneficial payment that John ever before made to the topic of treatment or bookkeeping (Dianetics). In my humble opinion, it is the best contribution that anyone has ever made to these subjectsthe application is totally non-judgemental, non-evaluative, and without any type of recommendation, recommendations or opinion.no preconceived schedule for people, or 'degrees' that they should do


In Scientology we prided ourselves on not assessing for individuals. All that actually meant was that the auditor did not VERBALLY examine for the Computer in session.

5 Simple Techniques For Dianetics

The Scientology Bridge is extremely evaluative and judgmentalAt initially, we liquid chalked up the distinction in find out this here results to helpful resources John's improvisational abilities and experience. Upon further examination, particular aspects came to lightIt was not a matter of what he WAS doing that the other experts weren't, yet instead what he WASN'T doing that they were.


Anybody that had actually ever seen John audit can not help yet see a distinct quality in his bookkeeping."The customer's fundamental role is to be there with the function of moving in the direction of their spiritual goals, and to easily and completely share and experience whatever manifests for them in addressing the inquiries and executing the directions in the processing.


This is something to process as needed. Also, people frequently have previous experience and/or indoctrination in auditing/processing which, in some means, and to some levels, in fact misguides them right into perspectives, concepts and actions patterns that prevent the full understanding of these roles, and so they will have a tendency to prevent the expressing of what comes to mind, as in the instances offered above - Dianetics. * The first, and perhaps primary examples of mis-indoctrination resulting in less than entirely smooth and efficient sessions, can be found in specific elements of the training routines, or "TR's":"TR's" are typically an individual's first, or a minimum of early, experience in Scientology, and while I will go on to explain what I see as the flaws in principle and practice, however, often tend to be substantially therapeutic, done as they are given (Hubbard urges that "TR's are not refining, they are training", but factually, they are both handling AND training)


Alan Walter made similar monitorings, and boosted on these with his "Presence Processes". There is no "flunking", and no rejection of the fact of this being handling. The emphasis, as it ought to be, gets on experiencing the other person's existence. All the indications which get a "fail" in doing "TR-0" are simply the being's efforts to stand up to the various other person's existence, and as opposed to being bugged and badgered with "Flunk", which imposes "failure!" on the being, one just requires to be urged to "stick their feet in the water a little deeper", to progressively restore their ability and willingness to fully share and experience "being right here", or "presence", with others.

Fascination About Dianetics

I wait up until the client looks at me as if to say "I'm done answering, over to you, what's next?" As long as the customer is looking somewhere else than back at the counselor, they are still processing the question or command. Bear in mind "a silent auditor welcomes itsa"; the client is still refining, till their interest plainly goes back to the counselor.